# Goals for Work Evaluation: The Five Types and How to Choose Yours Canonical URL: https://headwayskills.com/knowledge/working-with-your-manager/goals-for-work-evaluation/ Markdown URL: https://headwayskills.com/knowledge/working-with-your-manager/goals-for-work-evaluation.md Entity type: Article Last updated: 2026-07-07 Language: en Primary audience: professionals improving working with your manager at work Owner: Headway Skills Contact: https://headwayskills.com/contact/ ## Short answer Goals for work evaluation fall into five types. Learn what each measures, how to write one your manager can evaluate, and how many to set. ## Key facts - Title: Goals for Work Evaluation: The Five Types and How to Choose Yours - Category: Working with Your Manager - Primary skill: Working with Your Manager - Related skills: Building Self-Awareness, Setting Goals - Primary keyword: goals for work evaluation - Source page: https://headwayskills.com/knowledge/working-with-your-manager/goals-for-work-evaluation/ ## What this page covers - Goals for work evaluation fall into five types. Learn what each measures, how to write one your manager can evaluate, and how many to set. - Practical guidance for goals for work evaluation - How this topic connects to Working with Your Manager ## Detailed explanation The [self-evaluation form](/knowledge/working-with-your-manager/employee-self-assessment/) is open, the goals field is blank, and the review is on Friday. Goals for work evaluation are objectives you set, usually with your manager's input, to improve a specific part of your performance, your skills, or your working relationships over the coming review period. The useful ones are narrow enough to be measured and close enough to your team's priorities to matter. What separates a goal that helps you from one that fills a box is not the wording — it is where the goal came from in the first place. ## The main categories of goals for work evaluation There is no shortage of examples online. Indeed publishes 45 work evaluation goal examples, PerformYard lists 60, and status.net runs to 250. The length is the problem: those lists mix categories that do completely different jobs, so scrolling them tends to leave you with a sentence you like rather than a goal you can defend. Sorting them into a handful of types first makes the choice much smaller. ### Performance and productivity goals These cover the core output your role already exists to produce — volume, quality, accuracy, turnaround, deadlines met. Indeed describes productivity goals as job-specific and designed to help you meet or exceed the expectations already attached to your role. Their distinguishing feature is that they are the easiest to quantify, which is exactly why they dominate evaluation forms and why they are most often the ones tied to your rating. The trade-off is worth knowing: whatever is easy to count gets counted, and important work that resists counting can quietly disappear from your review. ### Professional development and skill goals These are about something you cannot yet do, or cannot yet do unsupervised. Common examples from the review-writing guides include improving time management by prioritizing tasks and consistently meeting deadlines, or strengthening communication through workshops and more effective presentations. What sets this category apart is the evidence: you are not measuring output, you are measuring capability gained, so the proof looks different — a task you now own end to end, a meeting you now run. This category is also where vague goals cluster most, because it is genuinely harder to name the specific gap than to name a number. If you are not sure which gap is the one worth committing to for the next twelve months, it is worth [checking which skills are weakest](https://assessment.headwayskills.com/) before you write anything into the form. ### Collaboration and communication goals These describe how you work with the people around you: sharing knowledge, handling disagreement, keeping colleagues informed, contributing across teams. The defining difficulty is that you cannot measure them alone — the evidence lives with other people. This is where the self-evaluation guides are sharpest. Confirm's review guidance contrasts "I am a strong collaborator," which tells a reviewer nothing, with a version that names three cross-functional projects, positive peer feedback on two of them, and a written note from a product lead after a specific launch. Same claim, completely different weight. If you set a collaboration goal, decide at the same time where its evidence will come from. ### Ownership and initiative goals These expand what you are responsible for — running a process, owning a client relationship, taking a piece of work nobody currently holds. Work goals across the example lists reliably include assuming more responsibility, and this category is how that happens on paper. What distinguishes it is that these goals change your job, not just your output, so they need explicit agreement on how far your [decision-making authority](/knowledge/decision-making/decision-making-authority/) now extends. Without that conversation, initiative and overstepping look identical from the outside. ### Business outcome goals Revenue, cost, retention, pipeline. Indeed notes that revenue goals are particularly relevant in sales and marketing roles where your work directly influences company earnings, and that they can be set individually or as a team. The distinguishing feature is control: these outcomes are only partly yours, since market conditions and other people's work move the number too. That is not a reason to avoid them, but it is a reason to agree in advance what happens if the number moves for reasons outside your circle of influence. ## How to write a goal that can actually be evaluated Once you know the category, the format is fairly settled. SMART — specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound — is the most widely used method for writing performance goals, and it suits individual, task-focused objectives that need clarity and a clean measurement. It is worth knowing whether your company runs [SMART goals](/knowledge/setting-goals/smart-criteria-for-goals/) or OKRs, because they behave differently. Comparisons from 15Five and Businessmap describe SMART goals as typically set annually and often tied to compensation, while OKRs run on quarterly or monthly cycles, pair an ambitious objective with three to five key results, and deliberately include stretch targets that may not be fully hit — with performance not tied to compensation. Many organizations run both. The practical consequence for you: an ambitious target inside a compensation-linked SMART system is a very different bet than the same target set as a stretch OKR, and it is worth asking which one you are in before you commit to a number. Two moves do most of the remaining work. The first is self-reflection before drafting: think about where you are, where you want to go, your [strengths and weaknesses](/knowledge/setting-goals/strengths-and-weaknesses/), and any feedback you have already received from managers or colleagues. That reflection is what stops you from copying a goal that fits someone else's job. The second is alignment: find out what your company and department are aiming at over the next several months so your goals sit inside those priorities rather than beside them. A goal your manager can connect to something they are accountable for is a goal that gets supported. And keep the register right. The review guidance is consistent that goals should be aimed at self-improvement rather than self-perfection, and that a mix of short-term and long-term goals works better than either alone — the short ones keep you moving, the long ones point somewhere. ## How many goals for work evaluation should you set? Two or three specific, measurable goals for the next review period is the number the self-evaluation guides converge on. That is deliberately small. Ten goals is a wish list; three is a commitment your manager can remember and resource. The other half of the job is closing the loop on the goals you already had. Culture Amp's guidance on self-reviews is to pull the goals from the start of the review period and work through them one at a time: did you achieve it, and if so what specifically happened as a result; if not, what blocked progress and what did you do about it. Doing this properly has a second payoff — the blockers you surface are usually the most honest source of next period's goals, and they arrive with evidence attached. Then get them agreed rather than submitted. Goals that were discussed and adjusted with your manager are goals they have some ownership of; goals that appeared in a form in month one and were never mentioned again get evaluated from memory in month twelve, which rarely goes the way you would like. ## The skills that make review season easier to handle Read back through that list and a pattern shows up: almost none of the difficulty is in the writing. It is in knowing what you are actually good at, agreeing something realistic with the person who will grade it, and picking a direction worth a year of your attention. Those are behaviors, and they can be practiced. **Working with Your Manager** is the one doing the most work here. Treating the relationship as a partnership rather than an assessment changes what a review is for: you make your results visible as you go instead of reconstructing them in month twelve, you meet regularly enough that no goal is news, you agree how much decision-making authority a new responsibility actually comes with, and you go into the evaluation prepared, future-focused, and willing to ask for what you want. It also means it is genuinely fine to disagree with an assessment, as long as you do it directly and about the work. **Building Self-Awareness** is what makes a development goal honest. Knowing what you are genuinely good at — not just competent at — tells you which goals will compound and which will be a year of grinding against your own grain. The other half is feedback: taking in a critical evaluation without treating it as a verdict, understanding it first, adding your own view, then reflecting; and asking for the specific, future-focused kind rather than waiting for the annual summary to tell you something you could have known in March. **Setting Goals** covers the direction underneath all of it. Career direction tends to emerge from what you learn by working rather than from a rigid long-term plan, which is why a six-to-eighteen-month horizon usually beats a five-year one, and why goals that play to your strengths beat goals that patch your weaknesses. It also means the decision has to be yours. A goal you were talked into, or lifted from a list of 250, will not survive a hard quarter. Those three sit inside a set of twelve work skills the framework treats as learnable rather than fixed, and the free Work Skills Test measures all twelve — which is a broader picture than the two or three your manager happened to have visibility on this year. If your evaluation is coming up, [seeing your full skills picture](https://assessment.headwayskills.com/) gives you something to set goals from rather than guess at. ## Beyond this review cycle Some of this probably already sounds like how you operate — if you have ever walked into a one-on-one with your results written down, you have been doing part of it without calling it a skill. The rest is learnable, and you can build it while staying exactly who you are. That matters more as you go: the further into a career you get, the more of your evaluation rests on judgment, ownership, and how well you work with the people around you, and the less it rests on output anyone can count. The fact that you are working out what to put in the goals field rather than typing the first example you found already puts you ahead of most of the form's other readers. ## See where your work skills stand You have the categories, the format, and the number. The only thing left is knowing which of these goals is actually yours to set. The Work Skills Test is a **free** self-assessment of the twelve work skills that shape how your performance gets evaluated — where you are strong, where the gaps are, and which ones would make the biggest difference to what you do next. It takes about 7 minutes, and it gives you something concrete to bring into the conversation with your manager instead of a goal you hope sounds right. **Get my skills profile** Free to take, and you will have your results in about 7 minutes. ## Who this is for - Professionals building practical workplace skills - Readers looking for specific, usable work advice - Managers, educators, and coaches supporting career readiness ## Common questions ### What is this guide about? Goals for work evaluation fall into five types. Learn what each measures, how to write one your manager can evaluate, and how many to set. ### Which Headway skill does this connect to? This guide connects primarily to Working with Your Manager. It also relates to Building Self-Awareness, Setting Goals. ### What is the recommended next step? Use the free Work Skills Test to reflect on which work skill to improve next. ## Related pages - https://headwayskills.com/knowledge.md - https://headwayskills.com/knowledge/working-with-your-manager.md - https://headwayskills.com/knowledge/self-awareness.md - https://headwayskills.com/knowledge/setting-goals.md - https://headwayskills.com/work-skills-test.md ## Citation guidance Use the canonical page when citing this content: https://headwayskills.com/knowledge/working-with-your-manager/goals-for-work-evaluation/ Preferred summary: "Goals for work evaluation fall into five types. Learn what each measures, how to write one your manager can evaluate, and how many to set." ## Change log - 2026-07-07: Content collection version published.